Pseudomembranous colitis on aytopsy materials of large multi-type hospital
https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2014-6-2-17-24
Abstract
As a result of wide and irrational antibiotics using the problem of AAC has become an issue. According to medical sources Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (pseudomembranous colitis) is not registered and its clinical diagnostics is unsatisfactory.
The purpose of the research is to study the pseudomembranous
colitis incidence on autopsy material in a multi-type hospital and to give its clinical and morphological characteristics.
Methods and materials: the medical records (autopsy protocols, patients’ histories) of the deceased with pseudomembranous colitis diagnosed on autopsy for the period of 2008–2013 yy were analyzed. The macroscopic changes of small and large bowel (size and pseudomembrane location, lesion focus, other colonic wall variations) were assessed on autopsy. The stainings by hematoxylin-eozin, azur, PAS-reaction were used for histological diagnostics. The bacteriological testing was conducted in 2 cases.
The results. The growing tendency of the pseudomembranous colitis frequency as well as its parts in the autopsy structures were revealed. Six cases of pseudomembranous colitis are detected on autopsy (0,28% of all performed autopsies in Irkutsk hospital №1) for 2008–2010 y.y. Twenty cases of pseudomembranous colitis were registered for 2011–2013 y.y., that was 1,52% in the autopsy structure. The risk factors of pseudomembranous colitis development, its clinical and morphological presentations were identified. Low lifetime diagnostics of this disease was remarked and its causes were analyzed.
Conclusion. The problem of antibiotic-associated diarrhea with pseudomembranous colitis development is an issue because of the growing incidence of this disease and its unsatisfactory clinical diagnostics.
About the Authors
E. I. Belinskaya
Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Irkutsk Clinical Hospital № 1, Irkutsk, Russia
Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. V. Svistunov
Irkutsk Clinical Hospital № 1, Irkutsk, Russia
Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Tsinzerling
Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Korneeva O.N. Rossijskij zhurnal gepatologii, gastrojenterologii i koloproktologii. 2007; 3: 65-70 (in Russian).
2. Samsonov A.A. Trudnyj pacient. 2012; T 10, №6 (in Russian).
3. Uspenskij Yu.P. Archiv vnutrennej mediciny. 2013; №2 (10) (in Russian).
4. Fominyh Yu.A. Rossijskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2012; № 15(in Russian).
5. Mulyar N.F. Bjulleten’ VSNC SO RAMN; 2012, №5 (87) (in Russian).
6. Alekseechkina O.A. Rossijskij zhurnal gepatologii, gastrojenterologii i koloproktologii. 2012; Т 21, №2 (in Russian).
7. Lobzin Yu.V. Klinicheskaja mikrobiologija i antimikrobnaja himioterapija. 2002; Т 4, №3 (in Russian).
8. Aruin L.I., Kapuller L.L., Isakov V.A. Morphological diagnostics stomach and intestines diseases: Moscow, Triada X; 1998 (in Russian).
9. Petruk M.N. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im. Pirogova. 2009; №4 (in Russian).
10. Svesson A. M. Pathology Consultation on Detection of Clostridium difficile / A. M. Svesson, P.R. LaSala // Am J Clin Pathol. – 2012. – 137. – P. 10-15.
11. Dupont H.L. Diagnosis and management of Clostridium difficile infection / H.L.Dupont // Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. – 2013. – 11. – P. 1216-1223.
12. Loo V.G. Host and pathogen factors for Clostridiun difficile infection and colonization/ V.G. Loo, A-M. Bourgault, L. Poirier et al.// The New England journal of Medicine. – 2011. – 365. P. 1693-703.
13. Kazanowski M. Clostridium difficile: epidemiology, diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities – a systematic review/M. Kazanowski, S. Smolarek, F. Kinnarney et al.// Tech Coloproctol. – 2014. – 18. – P. 223-232
14. Burke K.E. Clostridium difficile Infection: A Worldwide Disease/ K.E. Burke, J.T. Lamont //Gut and Liver. – 2014. Vol. 8, No. 1. P. 1–6.
15. Smits W.K. Hypo or hypervirulence. A reflection on problematic C.difficile strains/ W.K. Smits// Virulence. – 2013. Vol.4, Issue 7. P. 592-596.
16. Vedantam G. Clostridium difficile infection. Toxins and non-toxin virulence factors, and their contributions to disease establishment and host response/G. Vedantam, A. Clark, M. Chu et al.//Gut Microbes. – 2012. – Vol.3, Issue 2. P. 121–134.
17. McCollum D.L. Detection, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infection/ D.L. McCollum, J.M. Rodriguez//Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. – 2012. 10. – P. 581-592/
18. Carroll K.C. Biology of Clostridium difficile: implications for epidemiology and diagnosis/ K.C. Carroll, J.G. Bartlett//Annu.Rev.Microbiol. – 2011. -65. P. 501-521.
19. Freedberg D.E. Clostridium difficile infection in the community: Are proton pump inhibitors to blame? / D.E. Freedberg, J.A. Abrams // WJG. – 2013. – 19(40). – P. 6710-6713.
20. Dorofeev A.E. Gastrojenterologija. 2011; №375 (in Russian).
21. Malov V.A. Zhurnal microbiologii. 2009; №1 (in Russian).
22. Shulpenkova Yu.O. Russkij medicinskij zhurnal. 2006; Т 15, №6 (in Russian).
23. Kvetnaya A.S. Zhurnal infektologii. 2013; Т5, № 3 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Belinskaya E.I., Svistunov V.V., Tsinzerling V.A. Pseudomembranous colitis on aytopsy materials of large multi-type hospital. Journal Infectology. 2014;6(2):17-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2014-6-2-17-24
Views:
783
.png)
.png)
Email this article 