Cost analysis of the first line antiretroviral therapy in Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2014-6-1-72-77
Abstract
Costs of HIV-infection treatment in Russian Federation are a considerable burden on national resources.
Study objective: calculation of one year costs for first line antiretroviral therapy (ART) according to Recommendations (clinical guidelines) of Russian Federal/National Research and Methodology Centre of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, with assessment of patient access within a fixed budget.
Materials and methods: Cost calculation for acquisition of one year of ART is based on Emergency Drug List (EDL) registered prices by Ministry of Health including the VAT and 10% trade surplus. Comparisons are performed within treatment categories recommended by Russian clinical guidelines. ART selections within categories are assumed to be of similar efficacy and tolerability, according to Russian guidelines.
Results and discussion: annual cost of first line ART per patient vary from 44 to 286 thousand RUR. The choice of ART is primarily based on clinical situation and co-morbidity. Among ART regimens in the same treatment category, assuming similar clinical efficacy and tolerability profiles, the less costly are preferable.
Conclusions: comparison of alternative antiretroviral first line treatment regimens with comparable clinical efficacy and tolerability profiles demonstrates that cost minimization based on drug prices can grant access to treatment to maximum number of patients. Lopinavir/ritonavir is the less costly option in several guideline-recommended categories of first line regimens.
About the Author
A. V. RudakovaRussian Federation
References
1. Yagudina R.I., Kulikov AYu, Zinchuk IYu. Farmakoekonomika. 2011; 4(3): 14-8.
2. Pokrovskiy VV, editor. HIV infection and AIDS. 2th edition. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; с2010. 192р.
3. Broder MS, Chang EY, Bentley TGK, et al. Cost effectiveness of atazanavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-naive human immunodeficiency virusinfected patients in the United States . J. Med. Econ. 2011; 14 (2): 167-178.
4. Simpson KN, Baran RW, Collomb D, et al. Economic and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) comparison of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV+RTV) based regimens for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive and -experienced United Kingdom patients in 2011 . J. Med. Econ. 2012; 15(4): 796-806.
5. Government of St. Petersburg. O Programme “Profilaktika zabolevaniya, vyzyvayemogo virusom immunodefitsita cheloveka (VICh-infektsii), v Sankt-Peterburge na 2013-2015 gody: Postanovleniye № 28 ot 29.01.2013 [Internet]. [cited 2013 Feb 8]. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/ document/822401855. Russian.
Review
For citations:
Rudakova A.V. Cost analysis of the first line antiretroviral therapy in Russian Federation. Journal Infectology. 2014;6(1):72-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2014-6-1-72-77