Cost-effectiveness of narlaprevir in the chronic hepatitis C (genotype 1) therapy in treatment-naïve patients and relapsers
Abstract
In the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) protease inhibitors (PI) are actively used. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of narlaprevir and simeprevir in the CHC (genotype 1) therapy in treatment-naïve patients and relapsers.
Material and methods. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of simeprevir and narlaprevir was conducted from the perspective of the health care system based on QUEST-1, QUEST-2, ASPIRE and PIONEER clinical trials. The relative risk of achieving SVR 24 compared to the peg-INF + RBV therapy was used in the model. Treatment discontinuation in patients receiving narlaprevir assumed in the absence of a SVR after 12 weeks and in patients receiving simeprevir in the SVR absence after 4 weeks. The cost of narlaprevir was calculated on the basis of estimated registration price in case of EDL inclusion, including VAT. Costs of other antiviral drugs were in line with the results of 2016 average auctions prices.
Results. In the base case costs on antiviral drugs with narlaprevir as therapy are lower compared with simeprevir by 37,3 % (542,0 and 864,6 thousand rur, respectively), and the cost per patient with SVR 24 by 34,5%. In patients after relapse costs on antiviral drugs with narlaprevir as first-line therapy will decrease compared with simeprevir by 22,8% (542,0 and 702,5 thousand rur, respectively), and the cost per patient with SVR 24 by 41,3%. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated a high reliability of obtained results.
Conclusions. With comparable clinical efficacy and tolerability of narlaprevir and simeprevir both in treatment-naïve patients and patients with relapse after therapy, which included pegylated interferon and ribavirin, narlaprevir reduces the burden on the budget.
About the Authors
D. A. GusevRussian Federation
A. V. Rudakova
Russian Federation
A. N. Uskov
Russian Federation
L. N. Konovalova
Russian Federation
Yu. V. Lobzin
Russian Federation
References
1. EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2015 // Journal of Hepatology 2015; 63: 199–236.
2. Wendt A., Bourlière M. An update on the treatment of genotype-1 chronic hepatitis C infection: lessons from recent clinical trials // Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2013; 1(6): 191-208.
3. Manns M., Marcellin P., Poordad F., et al. Simeprevir with pegylated interferon alfa 2a or 2b plus ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection (QUEST-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial // Lancet 2014; 384 (9941): 414-26.
4. Jacobson I.M., Dore G.J., Foster G.R., et al. Simeprevir with pegylated interferon alfa 2a plus ribavirin in treatmentnaïve patients with chronic hepatitis c virus genotype 1 infection (QUEST-1): a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial // Lancet 2014;384:403-13.
5. Levin J. Simeprevir (TMC435) in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin for treatment of HCV genotype 1 infection in treatment-naïve and -experienced patients (PILLAR and ASPIRE Trials) // IDSA Oct 17-21 2012 San Diego.
6. Bakulin I.G., Abdurahmanov D.T., Bogomolov P.O. Predvaritel›nye rezul›taty is- sledovanija 3 fazy novogo otechestvennogo ingibitora proteazy narlaprevira u per- vichnyh i ranee lechennyh bol›nyh hronicheskim gepatitom S 1 genotipa (issledova- nie PIONEER) // Sbornik tezisov 42-oj nauchnoj sessii CNIIG «Principy dokaza-tel›noj mediciny v klinicheskuju praktiku », 02-03.03.2016, str.21.
7. Rudakova A.V., Gusev D.A., Uskov A.N., Lobzin Ju.V. Protivovirusnaja terapija hro- nicheskogo gepatita S (1 genotip): zatraty i jeffektivnost› // Zhurnal infektologii 2015; 7 (1): 91-98.
Review
For citations:
Gusev D.A., Rudakova A.V., Uskov A.N., Konovalova L.N., Lobzin Yu.V. Cost-effectiveness of narlaprevir in the chronic hepatitis C (genotype 1) therapy in treatment-naïve patients and relapsers. Journal Infectology. 2016;8(3):122-125. (In Russ.)