Expediency and prospects of a vaccinal prevention of whooping cough without age restrictions
https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2018-10-4-14-23
Abstract
The goal of study was the epidemiological substantiation of optimization measures of a vaccinal prevention of whooping cough in the Russian Federation.
Materials and methods. The retrospective descriptive epidemiological research has been conducted by analysis of the official statistical data on the whooping cough case rate (form No. 2) in 2005–2017 in the Russian Federation, as well as the data about preventive whooping cough inoculations (forms No. 5, No. 6) in 2005–2017 and about epidemic outbreakes in 2017 (form No. 23-17). The assessment of an economic damage from whooping cough in 2005-2017 has been carried out.
Results. The following adverse characteristics of a modern epidemiological situation on whooping cough in Russia are shown: long-term recurrence of epidemic process, tendency of rising of a case rate of children of 0-2 years; high percentage of children of preschool and school age among whooping cough cases; prevalence among the patients with whooping cough of the children who have been vaccinated against this infection previously, epidemic outbreakes in children’s collectives, the stability of a case rate of teenagers and adults with prevalence of the mild and the erased clinical forms of this infection. The risks due to weaknesses of the whooping cough vaccinal prevention are noted: the insufficient immunization coverage owing to falce contraindications and refusals of parents of vaccinations of children, noncompliance with terms and intervals between inoculations, lack of domestic vaccine for revaccination of children at the age of 5 years and older.
Conclusion. It is necessary to introduce in the national vaccination schedule a preschool booster dose for children at the age of 6 and adolescents at 14 years with the combined reduced antigen content tetanus–diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccines as well as the inoculations of this vaccine according to epidemiological indications to health workers, employees of educational institutions. A revaccination against whooping cough is recommended as “cocoon” for the persons contacting to not vaccinated child under 1 year of age.
About the Authors
I. V. Mikheeva
Central Research Institute of Epidemiology of The Federal Service on Customers’ Rights Protection and Human Well-being Surveillance, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
T. S. Saltykova
Central Research Institute of Epidemiology of The Federal Service on Customers’ Rights Protection and Human Well-being Surveillance, Moscow; First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. A. Mikheeva
Central Research Institute of Epidemiology of The Federal Service on Customers’ Rights Protection and Human Well-being Surveillance, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Pertussis vaccines: WHO position paper, August 2015// Weekly Epidemiological Recommendations. – 2015.- № 35.- V.90.- P.433-460.
2. http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/en. ссылка активна на 15 июля 2018.
3. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/immunization-coverage. Ссылка активна на 15.08.2018
4. Global Vaccine Action Plan Priority Country Reports on Progress towards GVAP-RVAP Goals. Annex to the GVAP Secretariat Annual Report 2017// Geneva: World Health Organization. 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
5. Zajcev, E. M. Improvement of diagnosis of whooping cough at adults with long cough./ E. M. Zajcev, I. K. Mazurova, M. S. Petrova// ZHurnal mikrobiologii, ehpidemiologii i immunobiologii. – 2009.-№ 2.- S.70-75.
6. http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meeting/2014/april/1_Pertussis_background_FINAL4_web.pdf.ua. Ссылка активна на 01.09.2018
7. Cherry, JD. Epidemic Pertussis in 2012. The Resurgence of Vaccine-Preventable Disease // The New England journal of medicine.- 2012. – 367(9).-P. 785-7.
8. O sostoyanii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2016 godu: Gosudarstvennyy doklad — Moscow: Federal’naya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebiteley i blagopoluchiya cheloveka, 2016 (in Russian). Available from: http://www.rospotrebnadzor.ru/upload/iblock/392/gd_zpp_2016_.pdf
9. Miheeva, I.V. Assessment of the direct economic loss caused by a rotavirus infection / I.V. Miheeva, M.A. Miheeva // Infekcionnye bolezni.- 2017.- t. 15. – №4. – S. 95–99.
10. O sostoyanii sanitarno-ehpidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Rossijskoj Federacii v 2017 godu: Gosudarstvennyj doklad –Moscow: Federal’naya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebitelej i blagopoluchiya cheloveka, 2018.–268 s. (in Russian). Available from: http://www.rospotrebnadzor.ru/upload/iblock/c51/gd_2017_seb.pdf
11. Tatochenko, V.K. Whooping cough – a not up to the end operated infection / V. K. Tatochenko // Voprosy sovremennoj pediatrii. – 2014.- №2. – S. 78-82.
12. Skoff, T.H. Sources of infant pertussis infection in the Unated States/ T.H. Skoff, С. Kenyon., N. Cocoros., J. Liko// Pediatrics. – 2015. – 136:635-641
13. Basov A.A. Epidemic process of whooping cough at the present stage: Avtoref. diss…kand. med. nauk. M.: 2016.-20 c.
14. Iozefovich, O. V. Prevalence of whooping cough at it is long the coughing children of 6-17 years, vaccinated at early age by AKDS- vaccine / O. V. Iozefovich., S. M. Harit , S . P. Kaplina //EHpidemiologiya i vakcinoprofilaktika. -2012.- №5.- S.56-59.
15. O sostoyanii sanitarno-ehpidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Ul’yanovskoj oblasti v 2015 g.: Gosudarstvennyj doklad. — Ul’yanovsk: Upravlenie Rospotrebnadzora po Ul’yanovskoj oblasti.- 2016. — 328 s.
16. O sostoyanii sanitarno-ehpidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Primorskom krae v 2016 g.: Gosudarstvennyj doklad. — Vladivostok: Upravlenie Rospotrebnadzora po Primorskomu krayu.-2017. — 250s.
17. CHuprinina, R.P. Molecular and genetic characteristic of production strains of koklyushny bacteria. / R.P. CHuprinina, I.A. Alekseeva, I.I. Borisevich //EHpidemiologiya i vakcinoprofilaktika.- 2013.-№ 3 (70).- S.63 – 70.
18. CHuprinina, R.P. Assessment of immunogene activity of a tselnokletochny pertussoid component of the combined vaccines in IFA. / R.P. CHuprinina, I.A. Alekseeva, A.P. Tarasov // EHpidemiologiya i vakcinoprofilaktika. -2013.-№ 5 (72).- S.60 – 65
19. Wendelboe, A.M. Duration of immunity against pertussis after natural infection or vaccination./ A.M Wendelboe., A. Van Rie, S. Salmaso // The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal.- 2005.- V. 24. -P. S58 – S61.
20. Tatochenko, V.K. The prospects of development of immunoprevention in Russia. // ZHurnal mikrobiologii, ehpidemiologii i immunobiologii. – 2010.- №5. – S. 90-98.
21. O sostoyanii sanitarno-ehpidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Altajskom krae v 2015 g.: Gosudarstvennyj doklad. — Barnaul: Upravlenie Rospotrebnadzora po Altajskomu krayu.- 2016. — 256 s.
22. Gorelikova E. V. Optimization of clinical laboratory diagnostics and epidemiological surveillance behind whooping cough: Avtoref. dis .. .. kand. med. nauk. Perm’.- 2006.
23. Quinn, H.E. Duration of protection after first dose of acellular pertussis vaccine in infants./ H.E. Quinn, T.L. Snelling, K.K. Macartney. // Pediatrics.- 2014. – 3(3):5.
24. Hellebrand, W. The epidemiology of pertussis in Germany: past and present. // BMC Infectious Diseases – 2009.- 9:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-22
25. Dalby, T. Epidemiology of pertussis in Denmark, 1995 to 2013/ T. Dalby , P., S. Hoffmann.// EuroSurveillanse. -2016.- 21(36): 30334. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.36.30334
26. De Greeff, SC. Impact of acellular pertussis preschool booster vaccination on disease burden of pertussis in the Netherlands./ S.C. de Greeff , F.R. Mooi , J.F. Schellekens . // Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal.- 2008. -V. 27 (3).-P. 218 – 223.
27. CHuprinina, R.P. Efficiency of immunoprophylaxis of whooping cough the combined vaccines containing the tselnokletochny or cell-free pertussoid vaccine / R.P. CHuprinina, I.A. Alekseeva, YU.I. Obuhov. // Biopreparaty.– 2014.– № 4.– S. 4–13
28. Wiley,K.E. Sources of pertussis infection in young infants: a review of key evidence informing targeting of the cocoon strategy/ K.E. Wiley, Y. Zuo, K.K. Macartney // Vaccine.- 2013.- 31: 618-625
29. Munoz, F.M. Safety and immunogenicity of tetanus diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization during pregnancy in mothers and infants; a randomized clinical trial / F.M. Munoz, N,H, Bond, M. Maccato// Journal of the American Medical Association.- 2014.- 311(17). P.:1760-1769
30. Donegan, K. Safety of pertussis vaccination in pregnant women in UK observational study./ K. Donegan, B. King, P. Bryan. // British Medical Journal.- 2014.- 349: g 4219
31. Schellekens, J. Pertussis sources and routes of transmission in the vaccination era./ J. Schellekens, C.H. von Konig, P. Gardner.// Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. -2005. – 24(5) – S19-S24.
Review
For citations:
Mikheeva I.V., Saltykova T.S., Mikheeva M.A. Expediency and prospects of a vaccinal prevention of whooping cough without age restrictions. Journal Infectology. 2018;10(4):14-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2018-10-4-14-23
Views:
1272
.png)
.png)
Email this article 