Preview

Journal Infectology

Advanced search

Tick-borne infections in the Leningrad oblast: incidence and seroprevalence

https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2024-16-1-67-74

Abstract

The study’s objective was to reveal trends in infections transmitted by ixodes ticks epidemic processes and the level of seroprevalence of the population to the tick-borne encephalitis virus, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Coxiella burnetii, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis/ E. muris in the Leningrad Oblast.

Materials and methods. A retrospective epidemiological analysis of the tick-bite incidence rate, the ixodic tick-borne borreliosis, tick-borne encephalitis, Q fever, human granulocytic anaplasmosis and human monocytic ehrlichiosis incidence rates, as well as vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis of the population of the Leningrad Oblast in 20112020. The official data of the tick-bite incidence rate, infections transmitted by ixodes ticks incidence rates and vaccination of the population was taken from the forms of federal statistical observation No. 2 and No. 5. Blood was sampled in 2019-2020 from randomly selected donors. Blood serum samples were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the presence of IgG antibodies to the pathogens of the studied infections using commercial test systems according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Results. In the Leningrad Oblast, in 2011-2020, there was a downward trend in the tick-bite incidence rate, as well as in the incidence rates of infections transmitted by ixodic ticks. The long-term average tick bite incidence rate was 369.0. The long-term average incidence rate of ixodic tick–borne borreliosis was 4.1; tick–borne encephalitis was 1.4; Q fever was 0.02. During the analyzed period, no cases of human granulocytic anaplasmosis and human monocytic ehrlichiosis were reported. The seroprevalence to tick-borne encephalitis virus was 1.7%; to B. burgdorferi s. l. – 3.7%; to C. burnetii – 1.8%; to A. phagocytophilum – 1.0%; to E. chaffeensis/ E.muris – 3.2%.

Conclusion. The results obtained indicate the existence of active natural foci of infections transmitted by ixodes ticks, fairly frequent contact of the residents with these foci, and possible significant hypodiagnosis of these infections in the Leningrad Oblast.

About the Authors

I. A. Karmokov
Saint-Petersburg Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Pasteur; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



E. G. Riabiko
Saint-Petersburg Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Pasteur; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



R. R. Baimova
Saint-Petersburg Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Pasteur
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



L. V. Buts
Office of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing in the Leningrad Oblast
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



E. S. Khalilov
Saint-Petersburg Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Pasteur
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



D. I. Grechishkina
Saint-Petersburg Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Pasteur
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



I. S. Lyzenko
Saint-Petersburg Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Pasteur
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



I. A. Bachinin
Saint-Petersburg Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Pasteur
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



N. K. Tokarevich
Saint-Petersburg Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology named after Pasteur
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



References

1. Madison-Antenucci S., Kramer L.D., Gebhardt L.L., Kauffman E. Emerging Tick-Borne Diseases. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 2020, vol. 33, no. 2. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00083-18

2. Gnativ B.R., Tokarevich N.K. Rezul’taty mnogoletnego monitoringa kleschevogo virusnogo encefalita i kleschevogo borrelioza v Respublike Komi // Infekcia i immunitet. 2021. T. 11, № 4. C. 707–722. DOI: 10.15789/2220-7619-ROL-1299

3. Tokarevich N.K., Tronin A.A., Buzinov R.V., Sokolova O.V., Unguryanu T.N. Analyzing risks of incidence of tickborne encephalitis in areas with different climatic and geographical conditions. Health Risk Analysis, 2021, no. 4, pp. 127–135. DOI: 10.21668/health.risk/2021.4.14.eng

4. Korenberg E.I., Pomelova V.G., Osin N.S. Prirodno-ochagovye infekcii, peredauschiesia iksodovymi kleschami. Moskva: Komment, 2013. 465 s.

5. Zhurina L.L., Kostko I.G., Davydov I.S. Metodicheskie ukazania po sostavleniu agroklimaticheskoi harakteristiki hozyaistva (raiona) dlya studentov agronomicheskih special’nostei (Leningradskaya oblast’). Sankt-Peterburg: SPbGAU, 2002. 20 s.

6. Tokarevich N.K., Blinova O.V., Stoyanova N.A., Baimova R.R., Siuziumova E.A., Lomonosova V.I., Tronin A.A., Buzinov R.V., Sokolova O.V., Gnativ B.R., Buts L.V., Bubnova L.A., Safonova O.S., Stankevich A.I, Kalinina E.L., Vikse R., Andreassen A.K. Seroprevalence of tick-borne diseases in the Northwest Federal District of the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity, 2022, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 891–901. DOI: 10.15789/2220-7619-SOT-1953

7. Dong Y., Zhou G., Cao W., Xu X., Zhang Y., Ji Z., Yang J., Chen J., Liu M., Fan Y., Kong J., Wen S., Li B., Yue P., Liu A., Bao F. Global seroprevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in human populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Global Health, 2022, vol. 7, no. 6. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007744

8. Vestrheim D.F., White R.A., Aaberge I.S., Aase A. Geographical differences in seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies in Norway, 2011-2013. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, 2016, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 698-702. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.02.020

9. Van Beek J., Sajanti E., Helve O., Ollgren J., Virtanen M.J., Rissanen H., Lyytikäinen O., Hytönen J., Sane J. Populationbased Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato seroprevalence and associated risk factors in Finland. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, 2018, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 275-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.10.018

10. Kersh G.J., Fitzpatrick K.A., Self J.S., Biggerstaff B.J. Long-term immune responses to Coxiella burnetii after vaccination. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2013, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 129–133. DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00613-12

11. Wielders C.C., Teunis P.F., Hermans M.H., Van Der Hoek W., Schneeberger P.M. Kinetics of antibody response to Coxiella burnetii infection (Q fever): estimation of the seroresponse onset from antibody levels. Epidemics, 2015, vol. 13, pp. 37-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2015.07.001

12. Hjetland R., Henningsson A.J., Vainio K., Dudman S.G., Grude N., Ulvestad E. Seroprevalence of antibodies to tickborne encephalitis virus and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in healthy adults from western Norway. Infectious Diseases, 2015, vol. 47, no.1, pp. 52-56. DOI: 10.3109/00365548.2014.959044

13. Thortveit E.T., Aase A., Petersen L.B., Lorentzen Å.R., Mygland Å., Ljøstad U. Human seroprevalence of antibodies to tick-borne microbes in southern Norway. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, 2020, vol. 11, no. 4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101410

14. Klimova Yu.A., Polovinkina N.A., Konnov V.V., Konnov D.S. Granulocitarnyi anaplazmoz cheloveka // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. 2018. T. 22, № 3. S. 322– 331. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0245-2018-22-3-322-331

15. Bakken J.S., Haller I., Riddell D., Walls J.J., Dumler J.S. The serological response of patients infected with the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2002, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 22-27. DOI: 10.1086/323811

16. Wang F., Yan M., Liu A., Chen T., Luo L., Li L., Teng Z., Li B., Ji Z., Jian M., Ding Z., Wen S., Zhang Y., Yue P., Cao W., Xu X., Zhou G., Bao F. The seroprevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in global human populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 2020, vol. 67, no. 5, pp.2050-2064. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13548

17. Lyapunova N.A., Hasnatinov M.A., Danchinova G.A. Seroprevalentnost’ k Anaplasma phagocytophilum i Ehrlichia sp. u lyudei, postradavshih ot ukusov kleschei // Acta biomedical scientifica. 2022. T. 7, № 5-1. S. 139-144. DOI: 10.29413/ABS.2022-7.5-1.15


Review

For citations:


Karmokov I.A., Riabiko E.G., Baimova R.R., Buts L.V., Khalilov E.S., Grechishkina D.I., Lyzenko I.S., Bachinin I.A., Tokarevich N.K. Tick-borne infections in the Leningrad oblast: incidence and seroprevalence. Journal Infectology. 2024;16(1):67-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2024-16-1-67-74

Views: 510


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-6732 (Print)