Preview

Journal Infectology

Advanced search

Diphyllobothriasis: diagnosis, treatment, prophylaxis

https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2023-15-1-61-67

Abstract

Helminthiases are found in the group of the most common and socially significant human infectious diseases. According to current data, at least 1 billion people are infected with helminths or pathogenic infections. One of the most important and widespread human biohelminth parasites in the Russian Federation is the broad-spectrum tapeworm (Diphyllobothrium latum). The absence of specific clinical diagnosis, as well as the predominance of latent forms, determines the presence of diphyllobothriasis disease. The aim of the study was to summarize current data on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory manifestations and therapy of diphyllobothriasis.  

Materials and methods. Clinical cases of diphyllobothriasis were analyzed among patients who were treated in January to November 2022 in the departments of the daytime period of clinical observation of the infectious diseases hospital named after S.P. Botkin, as well as the department of incidents detected and the clinical diagnostic center of Pediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases. Cases of the use of diseases, data from laboratory and instrumental studies, and therapy were evaluated. The most informative of them is given as a clinical example. The article also describes in detail the current biological and epidemiological features of Diphyllobothrium latum, the characteristic clinical picture of diseases and the most frequent complications.  

Results. Diphyllobothriasis still remains one of the most vulnerable biohelminthiases in Russia, typical for some patients of different ages. Verification of the diagnosis of “diphyllobothriasis” can be of the nature of an “accidental finding” during screening scatological or instrumental studies; upon admission, patients themselves begin to suspect helminthiasis when fragments of the strobila worm are found in the feces. To identify a conditional diagnosis of the pattern of clinical and laboratory infection (exclusion of a complicated course of diseases, helminthiases of a different etiology) and to determine risk factors for the transmission of diseases for the prevention of infections. 

About the Authors

T. V. Potapova
Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital named after S.P. Botkin; First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University named after academician I.P. Pavlov
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



K. D. Ermolenko
Pediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



E. Yu. Yushina
Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital named after S.P. Botkin
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



A. V. Kholin
Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital named after S.P. Botkin
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



I. V. Razdiakonova
Pediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



N. N. Vlasov
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



References

1. Davydova I. V. Gel’mintozy, registriruemye na territorii Rossijskoj Federacii: jepidemiologicheskaja situacija, osobennosti biologii parazitov, patogenez, klinika, diagnostika, jetiotropnaja terapija //Consilium medicum. – 2017. – T. 19. – №. 8. – S. 32-40.

2. Bylund B. G. Diphyllobothrium latum //Parasites of the colder climates. – CRC Press, 2002. – S.183-190.

3. O sostojanii sanitarno-jepidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchija naselenija v Rossijskoj Federacii v 2021 godu: Gosudarstvennyj doklad. M.: Federal’naja sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashhity prav potrebitelej i blagopoluchija cheloveka, 2022. 340 s.

4. Iizuka H., Kakizaki S., Onozato Y. Diagnostic value of colonoscopy in intestinal Diphyllobothrium latum infection // Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. – 2009. – T. 7. – №. 10. – S. e62-e63.

5. Balandina M. A., Sal’nikova E. O. DIAGNOSTIKA DIFILLOBOTRIOZA //Molodezh’ i medicinskaja nauka v XXI veke. – 2016. – S. 59-59.

6. Kozlov S. S., Turicin V. S., Laskin A. V. Diagnostika parazitozov. Mify sovremennosti //Zhurnal infektologii. – 2011– T. 3. – №. 1. – S. 64-68.

7. Arakel’jan R. S. i dr. Klinicheskie i jepidemiologicheskie aspekty difillobotrioza vzroslyh i detej //Mezhdunarodnyj nauchnoissledovatel’skij zhurnal. – 2022. – №. 8 (122). – S. 55.

8. Truhan D. I., Tarasova L. V. Gel’mintozy: aktual’nye voprosy //Consilium medicum. – 2013. – T. 12. – S. 52-6.

9. Llaguno M. M. et al. Diphyllobothrium latum infection in a non-endemic country: case report //Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. – 2008. – T. 41. – S. 301-303.

10. Poljakov V. E., Ivanova I. A., Poljakova N. R. Difillobotrioz //Pediatrija. Zhurnal im. GN Speranskogo. – 2007. – T. 86. – №. 5. – S. 104-108.

11. Tihonova D. V. Techenie difillobotrioza u rebenka rannego vozrasta //Sechenovskij vestnik. – 2014. – №. 4 (18). – S. 65-67.

12. Ob utverzhdenii sanitarnyh pravil i norm SanPiN 3.3686- 21 “Sanitarno-jepidemiologicheskie trebovanija po profilaktike infekcionnyh boleznej” Postanovlenie glavnogo gosudarstvennogo sanitarnogo vracha Rossijskoj Federacii ot 28 janvarja 2021 goda N 4 Jelektronnyj resurs: https://docs.cntd.ru/docum ent/573660140?marker=6560IO data obrashhenija 10.02.2023.


Review

For citations:


Potapova T.V., Ermolenko K.D., Yushina E.Yu., Kholin A.V., Razdiakonova I.V., Vlasov N.N. Diphyllobothriasis: diagnosis, treatment, prophylaxis. Journal Infectology. 2023;15(1):61-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2023-15-1-61-67

Views: 847


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-6732 (Print)