Preview

Journal Infectology

Advanced search

Cost-effectiveness of meningococcal vaccination of infants in the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2021-13-4-113-120

Abstract

Generalized forms of invasive meningococcal desease (IMD) are very dangerous because they have a high mortality rate.

The aim of the work was to assess the cost-effectiveness of meningococcal vaccination of infants with the 4-valent MenACWY-D conjugate vaccine in the Russian Federation.

Material and methods. Cost-effectiveness analysis based on epidemiological data for the Russian Federation was carried out by a modeling method with a horizon of 80 years from the position of the healthcare system and taking into account the social perspective. Vaccination costs were calculated on the basis of the registered price of the vaccine, including VAT, the costs of GFMI therapy and patient rehabilitation – based on the compulsory medical insurance tariffs in St. Petersburg for 2021. Indirect costs due to temporary disability of patients’ parents, disability of patients and premature death were estimated by the lost GDP. In the base case, costs were discounted by 3,5% per year, life expectancy – by 1,5% per year.

Results. Given the assumptions made, the average lifetime burden of a child’s illness is 17,556 million rubles. (no discounting). In the base case, the incremental cost per LYG from the payer perspective – 7,821 million rubles, and from the social perspective – 3,328 million rubles. Incremental cost per QALY – 5,350 million rubles and 2,277 million rubles, respectively. The most important factors that have a significant impact on the cost-effectiveness of vaccination are the incidence of IMD, the price of the vaccine, and the value of the discounting of costs and life expectancy.

Conclusions. Given the assumptions made, meningococcal vaccination of infants with 4-valent meningococcal vaccine can be considered as a viable option. 

About the Authors

A. V. Rudakova
Pediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



A. A. Vilnits
Pediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



S. M. Kharit
Pediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



Yu. V. Lobzin
Pediatric Research and Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases
Russian Federation

Saint-Petersburg



References

1. WHO vaccine-preventable diseases: monitoring system. 2019 global summary. Elektron-nyj resurs https://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/schedules (po sostoyaniyu na 15.10.2021

2. Martinón-Torres F, Taha MK, Knuf M, Abbing-Karahagopian V, Pellegrini M, Bekkat-Berkani R, Abitbol V. Evolving strategies for meningococcal vaccination in Europe: Over-view and key determinants for current and future considerations. Pathog Glob Health. 2021 Sep 27:1-14. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1972663. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34569453.

3. Mbaeyi SA, Bozio CH, Duffy J, Rubin LG, Hariri S, Stephens DS, MacNeil JR. Meningo-coccal Vaccination: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Sep 25;69(9):1-41. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6909a1. PMID: 33417592; PMCID: PMC7527029.

4. Crum-Cianflone N, Sullivan E. Meningococcal Vaccinations. Infect Dis Ther. 2016 Jun;5(2):89-112. doi: 10.1007/s40121-016-0107-0. Epub 2016 Apr 16. PMID: 27086142; PMCID: PMC4929086.

5. Baxter R, Keshavan P, Welsch JA, Han L, Smolenov I. Persistence of the immune response after MenACWY-CRM vaccination and response to a booster dose, in adolescents, children and infants. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 May 3;12(5):1300- 10. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1136040. Epub 2016 Feb 1. PMID: 26829877; PMCID: PMC4963074.

6. Viner RM, Booy R, Johnson H, Edmunds WJ, Hudson L, Bedford H, Kaczmarski E, Rajput K, Ramsay M, Christie D. Outcomes of invasive meningococcal serogroup B disease in chil-dren and adolescents (MOSAIC): a case-control study. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11:774-83; PMID:22863608; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70180-1

7. Hepkema H, Pouwels KB, van der Ende A, Westra TA, Postma MJ. Meningococcal serogroup A, C, W135 and Y conjugated vaccine: a cost-effectiveness analysis in the Nether-lands. PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e65036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065036. PMID: 23741448; PMCID: PMC3669019.

8. Stella-Silva N, Oliveira SA, Marzochi KB. [Meningococcal disease: comparison between clinical forms]. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2007;40: 304–10.

9. Osobo opasnaya infekciya: privivka ot meningita dolzhna vojti v NKPP Remedium. ZHurnal o rossijskom rynke lekarstv i medicinskoj tekhniki. 2020. № 4-6. S. 60-61.

10. Prohorov B.B., SHmakov D.I.Ocenka stoimosti statisticheskoj zhizni i ekonomicheskogo ushcherba ot poter’ zdorov’ya // Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2002. № 3. S. 125-135.

11. Wladysiuk M, Bebrysz M, Fedyna M, Haldas M, Rutkowski J, Jahnz-Rozyk K. Calculating indirect cost-differences caused by various approaches to unit costs. Results of move to work study (M2W) // ISPOR 6th Asia-Pacific Conference Beijing, China, September 6-9, 2014. PMS11

12. Cameron D, Ubels J, Norstr m F. On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review. Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1447828. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1447828. PMID: 29564962; PMCID: PMC5930346.

13. Macroeconomics and health: Investing in health for economic development. Report of the commission on macroeconomics and health to the WHO [Internet]. Geneva; 2001 Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42435/1/924154550X.pdf.

14. Gulácsi L, Rotar AM, Niewada M, et al. Health technology assessment in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15:S13–S25.

15. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po raschetu zatrat pri provedenii kliniko-ekonomicheskih issledovanij lekarstvennyh preparatov. Elektronnyj resurs https://rosmedex.ru/wpcontent/uploads/2018/02/Metodicheskie-rekomendatsii-poraschetu-zatrat-pri-provedenii-kliniko-e%60konomicheskihissledovaniy-lekarstvennyih-preparatov-2017.pdf

16. Ivahnenko O.I., Avksent’eva M.V., Maksimova L.V. Metody ucheta nepryamyh zatrat v ocenke tekhnologij zdravoohraneniya // Medicinskie tekhnologii. Ocenka i vybor.- 2013.- №1.-S. 29-35.

17. Svendsen MB, Ring Kofoed I, Nielsen H, Sch nheyder HC, Bodilsen J. Neurological seque-lae remain frequent after bacterial meningitis in children. Acta Paediatr. 2020 Feb;109(2):361- 367. doi: 10.1111/apa.14942. Epub 2019 Aug 11. PMID: 31325195.

18. Łyczko K, Borger J. Meningococcal Prophylaxis. 2021 Jun 12. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan–. PMID: 30726023.

19. Tan-Torres Edejer T, Baltussen R, Adam T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB,et al. Mak-ing choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2003.

20. Lipscomb J, Weinstein MC, Torrance GW. Time preference. In: Gold M, SiegelJ, Russel L, Weinstein M, editors. Costeffectiveness Heal. Med. New York, NY:Oxford University Press; 1996, p, 214-46.

21. Mathes T, Jacobs E, Morfeld J-C, Pieper D. Methods of international health technology as-sessment agencies for economic evaluations—a comparative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:371, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-371.

22. Walker DG, Hutubessy R, Beutels P. WHO Guide for standardisation of economic evalua-tions of immunization programmes. Vaccine 2010;28:2356–9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.06.035.

23. Haacker M, Hallett TB, Atun R. On discount rates for economic evaluations in global health. Health Policy Plan. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):107-114. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz127. PMID: 31625564.

24. Jit M, Mibei W. Discounting in the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of a vaccination programme: A critical review. Vaccine. 2015 Jul 31;33(32):3788-94. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.084. Epub 2015 Jul 2. PMID: 26144897.

25. Rudakova A.V. Harit S.M., Lyalina L.V., Lisyanskaya A.S., Procenko S.A., Miheeva I.V., Uskov A.N., Lobzin YU.V. Farmakoekonomicheskie aspekty vakcinacii protiv papillomavirusnoj infekcii devochek-podrostkov v Rossijskoj Federacii // Pedi-atricheskaya farmakologiya.- 2017.-T. 14. № 6. S. 494-500.

26. Rudakova A.V., Harit S.M., Podkolzin A.T., Uskov A.N., Lobzin YU.V. Ocenka effek-tivnosti zatrat na vakcinaciyu detej 5-valentnoj vakcinoj protiv rotavirusnoj in-fekcii v Rossijskoj Federacii // Pediatricheskaya farmakologiya.-2017.-T. 14. № 6. S. 501-508.

27. Rudakova A.V,, Briko N.I., Lobzin YU.V., NamazovaBaranova L.S., Avdeev S.N., Igna-tova G.L., Kostinov M.P., Koroleva I.S., Polibin R.V., Fomin I.V.. Vakcinaciya vzroslyh protiv pnevmokokkovoj infekcii v Rossijskoj Federacii: social’nye i farmakoekonomicheskie aspekty // ZHurnal infektologii.- 2018.-T. 10. № 3. S. 11-22.

28. Rudakova A.V., Harit S.M., Babachenko I.V., Konovalova L.N., Rychkova S.V., Uskov A.N., Lobzin YU.V. Effektivnost’ zatrat na vakcinaciyu detej protiv vetryanoj ospy v Rossijskoj Federacii // ZHurnal infektologii. 2021. T. 13. № 3. S. 114-119.


Review

For citations:


Rudakova A.V., Vilnits A.A., Kharit S.M., Lobzin Yu.V. Cost-effectiveness of meningococcal vaccination of infants in the Russian Federation. Journal Infectology. 2021;13(4):113-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2021-13-4-113-120

Views: 2103


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-6732 (Print)